Testimonials

  • “Given their representation of the lead plaintiffs to date… Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP, with substantial experience with securities class action litigation, [is] adequate to serve as class counsel.” In re AVEO Pharm., Inc. Sec. Litig., (D. Mass.) 
  • Shapiro Haber & Urmy litigated “with considerable skill and experience” and demonstrated “excellent lawyering.” Kenney v. State St. Corp. (D. Mass.) 
  • Shapiro Haber & Urmy is “highly skilled” and has “significant class action experience.” Arnett v. Bank of Am., N.A. (D. Or.).  
  • “Shapiro Haber & Urmy is an eleven-lawyer firm with a national reputation for litigating a variety of national class actions.” Davis v. Footbridge Eng’g Servs., LLC (D. Mass.).  
  • Shapiro Haber & Urmy “comes with a wealth of experience and skill in prosecuting class actions.” US West, Inc. v. Macallister (D. Colo.). 
  • Shapiro Haber & Urmy litigated the case "with considerable skill and experience" and demonstrated "excellent lawyering". Richard v. State St. Corp., (D. Mass. 2014).
  • Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP "comes with a wealth of experience and skill in prosecuting class actions" U.S. West, Inc. v. MacAllister.  (D. Colo.).
  • "The high quality of representation provided by [Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP] is evident from the extensive record of this case." In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Research Reports Securities Litigation.  (S.D.N.Y.).
  • Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP is "highly qualified both generally, and in the specific context of private class actions under the Federal securities laws." Coopersmith v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.  (D. Mass.).
  • Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP is "highly qualified to act as lead counsel for the Class" and "has extensive experience in prosecuting class actions, including as lead counsel." United State Trust Co. of New York v. Albert.  (S.D.N.Y.).
  • Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP "have wide experience in the field of securities class litigation ... counsels' skillful and zealous representation over a six-year period enabled the settling classes to obtain a favorable and certain cash recovery." In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Research Reports Securities Litigation.  (S.D.N.Y.).
  • Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP "has broad-based experience in complex litigation, including experience in securities fraud class actions in this district and others." Swack v. Credit Suisse First Boston.  (D. Mass.).
  • "I am satisfied that [Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP] will prosecute this action vigorously and will protect the interests of the absent class members." McLaughlin v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.  (D. Mass.).
  • "I think that [Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP] has done an excellent job on this and makes my job much, much easier." Olmeda v. AM Broadband, LLC.  (D. Mass.).
  • In approving a shareholder derivative settlement in a case in which the firm was one of two co-lead counsel, the Court observed that this was a good settlement with meaningful relief.  In re Staples, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation.  (Delaware Chancery Court).